A double-blind, randomized, comparative study evaluating clinical effects of two sequential estradiol-progestogen combinations containing either desogestrel or medroxyprogesterone acetate in climacteric women

Maturitas. 2000 Feb 15;34(2):133-42. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(99)00103-6.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare a new sequential estradiol-desogestrel (E2-DSG) hormone replacement regimen (Liseta) with one of the standard treatments i.e. estradiol valerate-medroxyprogesterone acetate (E2V-MPA) combination (Klimalet) regarding the alleviation of climacteric symptoms, vaginal bleeding pattern and the occurrence of adverse experiences.

Methods: In a multicenter study performed in Denmark, a total of 376 perimenopausal women with climacteric symptoms were randomly allocated to oral sequential treatment with either E2-DSG (1.5 mg E2 for 24 days with 0.15 mg DSG for the last 12 days followed by a placebo tablet for 4 days) (n = 186) or with E2V-MPA (2 mg E2V for 21 days with 10 mg MPA for the last 10 days) (n = 190). Treatments were administered, using a double-blind, double-dummy technique for 6 cycles of 28 days.

Results: Three hundred and seventeen women, 158 in the E2-DSG and 159 in the E2V-MPA group, completed six treatment cycles. Both treatments reduced menopausal symptoms rapidly and to a similar extent. Hot flushes were present in 88% of the women in both groups. After six treatment cycles, hot flushes were no longer present in 71 and 62% of the women in the E2-DSG and E2V-MPA group, respectively. Perspiration decreased from 80 to 65% in the E2-DSG group and from 82 to 63% in the E2V-MPA group. Mood disturbances were present in 82% of the women in the E2-DSG at baseline, and in 52% after six cycles. In the E2V-MPA group the corresponding figures were 68 and 42%, respectively. The bleeding pattern was comparable in both treatment groups. Regular withdrawal (expected) bleeding appeared in 90-92% and in 85-90% of the women in cycles 1-5 with E2-DSG and E2V-MPA, respectively. Irregular bleeding (including spotting) occurred in 15.2% of the women receiving E2-DSG and in 20.1% of the women treated with E2V-MPA in cycle 6. In both treatment groups there was a tendency of a slight decrease in blood pressure. Adverse events were in less than 10% in each group the reason to discontinue treatment.

Conclusions: Both treatments effectively alleviated menopausal complaints and presented good cycle control. Bleeding pattern and mood disturbances appeared to be more favorable influenced by E2-DSG.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Climacteric / drug effects*
  • Desogestrel / administration & dosage
  • Desogestrel / adverse effects
  • Desogestrel / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Estradiol / administration & dosage
  • Estradiol / adverse effects
  • Estradiol / analogs & derivatives*
  • Estradiol / therapeutic use*
  • Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) / administration & dosage
  • Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) / adverse effects
  • Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Flushing / prevention & control
  • Hormone Replacement Therapy / adverse effects
  • Hormone Replacement Therapy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Medroxyprogesterone Acetate / administration & dosage
  • Medroxyprogesterone Acetate / adverse effects
  • Medroxyprogesterone Acetate / therapeutic use*
  • Menopause / drug effects
  • Middle Aged
  • Mood Disorders / prevention & control
  • Placebos
  • Progesterone Congeners / administration & dosage
  • Progesterone Congeners / adverse effects
  • Progesterone Congeners / therapeutic use*
  • Sweating / drug effects
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / chemically induced

Substances

  • Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)
  • Placebos
  • Progesterone Congeners
  • Estradiol
  • Desogestrel
  • Medroxyprogesterone Acetate