Cost-effectiveness analysis methods for the REACT Study

West J Nurs Res. 2000 Jun;22(4):460-74. doi: 10.1177/01939450022044520.

Abstract

The Reconditioning Exercise and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Trial (REACT) is a two-arm randomized clinical trial designed to compare short-term versus long-term exercise intervention in terms of physical function, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Clinical trials such as REACT are now routinely paired with economic analyses, and nurses can expect to play a growing role in the conduct of these studies. This article describes a model that is useful for structuring economic evaluations of health care interventions, and illustrates a cost-effectiveness analysis that is being conducted in conjunction with the REACT study. An in-depth description of collection methods and procedures is provided, as well as a summary of recruitment and retention experience to date.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cost of Illness
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Data Collection / methods
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Exercise Therapy / economics*
  • Exercise Therapy / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive / economics*
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive / rehabilitation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Econometric*
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Time Factors