Development of the Paediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for use in the United Kingdom

J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):224-30. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.224.

Abstract

Background: This paper describes a study to develop and test an instrument to measure the level of appropriate admissions and days of care in the paediatric hospital population.

Methods: The American version of the Paediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (PAEP) was modified by the consensus views of a panel of paediatricians and general practitioners. Reliability was tested in a pilot study in a random sample of 47 admissions from two district general hospitals.

Results: The agreement beyond chance for the raters using the PAEP for admission criteria was excellent (kappa = 0.848). It was poor (kappa = 0.345) for clinicians using subjective judgement. The agreement beyond chance for the day of care criteria was good (kappa =0.54). Trained reviewers achieved much higher reliability using the PAEP.

Conclusion: The modified PAEP achieved high reliability and was judged acceptable by clinicians to retrospectively assess the appropriateness of admissions in the UK setting.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Health Services Misuse / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, District
  • Hospitals, General
  • Hospitals, Pediatric*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data*
  • Needs Assessment
  • Observer Variation
  • Patient Admission / statistics & numerical data*
  • Patient Selection
  • Pilot Projects
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • State Medicine
  • United Kingdom
  • Utilization Review / organization & administration*