Limited influence of pouch function on quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 May-Jun;47(33):746-50.

Abstract

Background/aims: Despite a high frequency of pouch function disorders, most patients are satisfied with the outcome of ileo-anal pouch surgery. Aims of this study were: 1) To assess the influence of pouch function on quality of life and, 2) to determine which aspects of pouch dysfunction affect quality of life the most.

Methodology: Questionnaires, addressing current pouch function and quality of life (Rand-36, GIQLI), were sent to all (53) patients with intact ileo-anal pouches, operated on between 1987 and 1997 in our center.

Results: Thirty-six of 53 patients responded. Compared to reference data, Rand-36 scores for role-limitations based on a physical problem, vitality and general health perception were significantly diminished (P < 0.01). Physical and social functioning were normal. The GIQLI score was slightly decreased (111.7 vs. 125.8, P < 0.01). Overall pouch function did not correlate with the overall Rand-36 score, but correlated well with the overall GIQLI score (r = -0.47). Both quality of life scores were diminished mainly by the night-time stool frequency.

Conclusions: 1) Quality of life after IPAA, as measured with validated questionnaires, is only slightly decreased; 2) the GIQLI questionnaire is more sensitive to pouch dysfunction than the Rand-36; 3) night-time stool frequency influences quality of life the most.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative*
  • Quality of Life*