Lubeluzole in acute ischemic stroke treatment: A double-blind study with an 8-hour inclusion window comparing a 10-mg daily dose of lubeluzole with placebo

Stroke. 2000 Nov;31(11):2543-51. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.11.2543.

Abstract

Background and purpose: This trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial with an 8-hour inclusion window to assess the efficacy and safety of an intravenous loading dose of 7.5 mg followed by a daily intravenous dose of 10 mg lubeluzole for 5 days in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Methods: A total of 1786 patients were randomized: 901 to lubeluzole and 885 to placebo. Overall, 212 patients (23.5%) from the lubeluzole group and 213 (24.1%) from the placebo group discontinued the trial prematurely. In the lubeluzole group 201 patients (22.3%) discontinued because of adverse events compared with 193 patients (21.8%) in the placebo group.

Results: The primary population for the efficacy analysis comprised the core stroke patients (exclusion of older patients aged >75 years with severe stroke) in the 0- to 6-hour inclusion time window. The primary efficacy parameter was a 3-category functional status (Barthel Index 70 to 100/0 to 70/vegetative, dead) at week 12. In the lubeluzole group 207 patients (47.8%) were classified as mildly dependent/independent at week 12, 131 (30.3%) were moderately/severely dependent, and 95 (21.9%) were vegetative/dead. In the placebo group these numbers were 221 (54.4%), 112 (27.6%), and 73 (18.0%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups (P:=0.162). Additionally, for none of the secondary efficacy parameters (mortality at week 12, modified Rankin score, total Barthel score) was a statistically significant difference between the lubeluzole and placebo groups obtained. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatments for all treated patients, patients included within the 6- to 8-hour window, and patients with severe strokes aged >75 years. Overall, of all treated patients, 401 (22.5%) died: 203 (22.5%) in the lubeluzole group and 198 (22.4%) with placebo. Of all subjects treated, 853 (95%) on lubeluzole and 826 (93%) on placebo reported an adverse event during their treatment period or within the next 2 days after discontinuation of treatment. The most frequently observed adverse events were fever (25.9% lubeluzole; 23.4% placebo), constipation (20.2%; 19.7%), and headache (17.6%; 21.2%). Imbalances were found for atrial fibrillation (1.8% lubeluzole; 1.1% placebo) and QT prolongation (0.9%; 0.2%).

Conclusions: This study failed to show an efficacy of lubeluzole in the treatment of acute stroke. On the other hand, lubeluzole treatment by the current dosage schedule was not associated with a significant safety problem.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Neuroprotective Agents / administration & dosage
  • Neuroprotective Agents / adverse effects
  • Neuroprotective Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Piperidines / administration & dosage
  • Piperidines / adverse effects
  • Piperidines / therapeutic use*
  • Placebos
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Stroke / diagnosis
  • Stroke / drug therapy*
  • Thiazoles / administration & dosage
  • Thiazoles / adverse effects
  • Thiazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Neuroprotective Agents
  • Piperidines
  • Placebos
  • Thiazoles
  • lubeluzole