Introduction: To compare an invasive strategy employing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) with a medical strategy in patients who had received thrombolytic treatment for first acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and with signs of inducible ischaemia.
Methods: In a prospective study 1008 patients were randomized, 503 to invasive treatment, of whom 266 (52.9%) had PTCA, and 147 (29.2%) CABG, 505 to conservative treatment, of whom eight (1.6%) were revascularized within two months.
Results: After a median follow-up of 2.4 years the mortality in the invasive group was 3.6% vs. 4.4% (p = 0.45) in the conservative group, re-infarction incidence was 5.6% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.0038) and percentage of admissions with unstable angina was 17.9% vs. 29.5% (p < 0.00001).
Discussion: We conclude that post-infarct patients with inducible ischaemia should be referred to coronary angiography and revascularised accordingly.