Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation

Clin Rehabil. 2000 Dec;14(6):611-7. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr369oa.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the perceived barriers to evidence-based practice by health professionals working within the field of stroke rehabilitation.

Design: Focus groups were carried out to identify the perceived barriers; these were followed by a postal questionnaire that asked stroke rehabilitation professionals to rate their agreement with the perceived barriers.

Subjects: One hundred and five stroke rehabilitation professionals participated in the focus groups and were sent the postal questionnaire. Eighty-six responses were returned, from 27 physiotherapists, 26 occupational therapists, 22 nurses, 6 speech and language therapists, and 5 other professionals.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of subjects rating their level of agreement with statements as 1 'agree', 2, 3, 4 or 5 'disagree'. Scores of 1 or 2 were classified as 'agreement', and scores of 4 or 5 were classified as 'disagreement': the percentages of subjects agreeing or disagreeing with each statement were calculated.

Results: Twenty barriers were identified, classified under the headings 'ability', 'opportunity' and 'implementation'. Seventy-nine (92%) of all respondents agreed that keeping up to date with research findings was important to them, but only 7 (8%) were happy with the time that they had to do this. Fifty-eight (67%) perceived a need for further training. Only 4 (5%) agreed that it was easy to transfer research findings into their daily practice. A number of significant differences were found between the perceived barriers of different disciplines.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Allied Health Personnel / psychology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Stroke Rehabilitation*