Management of esophageal perforation

Surg Today. 2001;31(1):36-9. doi: 10.1007/s005950170217.

Abstract

Despite recent advances in thoracic surgery, the management of esophageal perforation remains problematical and controversial. Thirty-one patients were treated for an esophageal perforation between 1986 and 1998. The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 25 cases, spontaneous in 2, traumatic in 2, and caused by a tumor and tuberculous lymphadenitis in 2 patients. There were 10 cervical, 19 thoracic, and 2 abdominal perforations. The interval from perforation to operation was less than 24h in 12 patients and more than 24h in 19 patients. The surgical procedures included a primary repair in 12 patients, a resection in 8, and conservative treatment with minor surgical approaches in 11. The mortality rate was 20% (4/20 patients) in the surgical treatment group and 45.5% (5/11 patients) in the conservative treatment with minor surgery group. The overall mortality was 29% (9/31 patients). The prognosis is thus concluded to depend on the cause and location of the perforation, the presence of underlying esophageal diseases, and the surgical procedure chosen.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Esophageal Perforation / etiology
  • Esophageal Perforation / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mortality
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors