Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test

J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Jun;10(3):159-61. doi: 10.1080/714052738.

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST).

Methods: This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation.

Results: A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was -22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST (p <0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.972, consistent with high specificity and sensitivity.

Conclusion: The fetal heart rate response to external stimulation correlates with the formal NST.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Fetal Heart / diagnostic imaging*
  • Fetal Heart / physiopathology*
  • Fetal Movement / physiology
  • Gestational Age
  • Heart Rate, Fetal / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Physical Stimulation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pregnancy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reflex, Startle / physiology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Stress, Physiological / diagnostic imaging
  • Stress, Physiological / physiopathology*
  • Transducers
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal