Enteral vs parenteral nutrition after major abdominal surgery: an even match

Arch Surg. 2001 Aug;136(8):933-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.8.933.

Abstract

Hypothesis: Immediate enteral feeding following major abdominal surgery reduces postoperative complications and mortality when compared with parenteral nutrition.

Design: A prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Setting: A university hospital department of digestive surgery.

Patients and interventions: Two hundred forty-one malnourished patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive, after surgery, either enteral (enteral nutrition group: 119 patients) or parenteral nutrition (total parenteral nutrition group: 122 patients). The patients were monitored for postoperative complications and mortality.

Results: The rate of major postoperative complications was similar in the enteral and parenteral groups (enteral nutrition group: 37.8%; total parenteral nutrition group: 39.3%; P was not significant), as were the overall postoperative mortality rates (5.9% and 2.5%, respectively; P was not significant).

Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate that enteral feeding following major abdominal surgery reduces postoperative complications and mortality when compared with parenteral nutrition.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures / adverse effects*
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures / mortality
  • Enteral Nutrition*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nutritional Status
  • Parenteral Nutrition*
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Prospective Studies