A construct validation study of the Response Styles Questionnaire Rumination Scale in participants with a recent-onset major depressive episode

Psychol Assess. 2001 Sep;13(3):375-83. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.3.375.

Abstract

This study examined the construct validity and clinical utility of S. Nolen-Hoeksema's (1991) Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ) Rumination scale. Eighty-eight participants with recent-onset major depressive episodes were assessed and followed for 6 months, using semistructured interviews and self-report inventories. The RSQ Rumination scale exhibited poor 6-month stability and appeared to be closely linked to participants' clinical status-mood state. The scale was significantly correlated with conceptually related constructs such as emotion-focused coping, negative affectivity-temperament, and self-criticism. However, baseline negative temperament and self-criticism predicted key aspects of the 6-month course and outcome of major depressive episodes, whereas baseline rumination did not. Finally, rumination appeared to be closely associated with the severity of the depressive episode, rather than defining a distinct clinical subtype.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Depression / diagnosis
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / diagnosis*
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / psychology
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards*
  • Psychometrics
  • Remission, Spontaneous
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sampling Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index