[Assessment of thoracic X-ray readings by emergency room physicians at a university hospital]

Med Clin (Barc). 2001 Sep 29;117(9):332-3. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)72104-5.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Background: We aimed to find out whether systematic reading of chest radiography (CRx) by radiologists in the emergency unit might lead to a higher diagnostic efficiency and improve health care.

Material and method: Descriptive study of consecutive admissions during 3 months in an internal medicine department. We registered the CRx interpretation by the emergency unit physician first, and a radiologist the next day. In cases with different interpretations, we assessed whether these differences would have modified the treatment.

Results: The overall disagreement between the emergency room physician and the radiologist was 13.7%. In 19 of 29 cases with different readings, the radiologist interpretation was in agreement with the final diagnosis. In 7 of these 19 cases, the radiologist reading of CRx would have led to a positive change of treatment. However, differences between both physicians were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: There seems to be a higher diagnostic efficiency when the emergency room physician interpretation of CRx is complemented by a radiologist.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Emergency Service, Hospital*
  • Female
  • Hospitals, University*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Physicians
  • Radiography, Thoracic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Spain