In this article, the authors reviewed the literature published since 1965 concerning restraint and seclusion. They synthesized the contents of the articles reviewed using the categories of indications and contraindications; rates of seclusion and restraint as well as demographic, clinical, and environmental factors that affect these rates; effects on patients and staff; implementation; and training. The literature on restraint and seclusion supports the following: 1) Seclusion and restraint are basically efficacious in preventing injury and reducing agitation; 2) It is nearly impossible to operate a program for severely symptomatic individuals without some form of seclusion or physical or mechanical restraint; 3) Demographic and clinical factors have limited influence on rates of restraint and seclusion; 4) Training in prediction and prevention of violence, in self-defense, and in implementation of restraint and/or seclusion is valuable in reducing rates and untoward effects; 5) Studies comparing well-defined training programs have potential usefulness.