Objective: To compare resuscitation with 0.9% saline with Hextend, a synthetic colloid in a balanced electrolyte solution, in terms of acid-base status and survival time in an experimental model of septic shock in the rat.
Design: Randomized, open-label, controlled experiment.
Setting: University research laboratory.
Subjects: Sixty adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Intervention: Animals were studied for 12 hrs after intravenous infusion of Escherichia coli endotoxin (20 mg/kg). Animals were volume resuscitated to maintain a mean arterial pressure >60 mm Hg using either 0.9% saline (n = 25), Hextend (n = 25), or lactated Ringer's (n = 10).
Measurements: Arterial blood gases and electrolytes were measured before and after resuscitation (0, 180, 360, and 540 mins after endotoxin infusion). Survival time was measured, up to 12 hrs.
Results: Mean survival time among animals treated with saline or Ringer's was 45% less compared with Hextend-treated animals: 391 +/- 151 mins and 362 +/- 94 mins vs. 567 +/- 140 mins, respectively, p <.0001. Overall survival (at 12 hrs) was 0% with saline or Ringer's vs. 20% with Hextend, p =.05. After resuscitation with saline, arterial standard base excess and plasma apparent strong ion difference were both significantly lower (-19.3 +/- 5.2 vs. -12.1 +/- 5.7, p <.001, and 23.0 +/- 6.2 vs. 30.3 +/- 2.9, p <.0001, respectively) and plasma Cl(-) was significantly higher (123 +/- 7 vs. 115 +/- 3 mmol/L, p <.0001) compared with Hextend. Resuscitation with Ringer's solution resulted in a standard base excess, and Cl(-) between that of saline and Hextend (-15.4 +/- 3.1, and 117 +/- 3, respectively).
Conclusion: Compared with 0.9% saline, volume resuscitation with Hextend was associated with less metabolic acidosis and longer survival in this experimental animal model of septic shock.