Objectives: To compare quality of harvested tissue, false-negative rate, and complication rate of large-core needle breast biopsy (LCNBB) and directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (DVABB) in non-palpable breast lesions.
Patients and methods: From 1994 to 1999, in 580 non-palpable breast lesions a stereotactically-guided breast biopsy was performed. 14-G LCNBB was used in 168 lesions (29 %). DVABB was used in 412 lesions (71 %; 11-G DVABB: 134 lesions 32.5 %, 14-G DVABB: 278 lesions 67.5 %). Following biopsy, patients underwent either surgical excision (n = 533; 93.8 %) or mammographical follow-up (n = 36; 6.2 %). Histological results of LCNBB, DVABB, surgical breast biopsy and follow-up results were compared and scored for their tissue quality on a three-point scale (1 = disagreement between biopsy and surgery; 2 = partial agreement; 3 = complete agreement). In addition, we determined the false negative and complication rate for both systems.
Results: Histological examination after surgery and follow-up proved 262 (45.2 %) to be benign, 15 (2.6 %) to be high-risk lesions and 303 (52.5 %) to be malignant. In the tissue quality there was no significant difference between 14-G LCNBB (score = 2.94), 11-G DVABB (score = 2.92) and 14-G DVABB (score = 2.91) (p > 0.05). Particularly, in calcifications 11-G DVABB scored better (score = 2.92) than 14-G DVABB (score = 2.88) (p > 0.05). 14-G LCNBB had a lower false negative rate (1.8 %) than 11-G DVABB (3 %) and 14-G DVABB (3.2 %) (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the complication rate between the different needle types.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that both LCNBB and DVABB are reliable and safe techniques in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions. However, the use of 14-G LCNBB seems to be advantageous in masses, the use of 11-G DVABB seems to be advantageous in asymmetric densities and calcifications.