Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of cervical spine standard radiographs, performed in emergency, and compared with entire cervical helical CT with multiplanar reconstructions as reference.
Study design: Open prospective study.
Patients and methods: We conducted a six months prospective study including all patients over 15 years of age and unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale < or = 12). Each patient underwent standard radiographs as well as helical CT of the entire cervical spine. Three senior surgeons and one senior radiologist evaluated the standard radiographs quality. The interpretation was performed by 7 different groups of judges. Two radiologists interpreted the helical CT. For each group, the sensibility, the specificity and the count of correct diagnosis for the standard radiographs were evaluated. The results of the correct diagnosis of each group were then compared to determine the most performant group.
Results: Fifty-one patients were included. Helical CT diagnosed spine injuries in 11 patients. The quality of standard radiographs was poor with less than 10% judged correct and 90% of the C7-D1 junction not visible. In the best group (radiologist), the sensibility was 50%, the specificity was 85% and the count of correct diagnosis was 78%. For the correct diagnosis, senior radiologist was significantly better than anaesthetist students, radiologist students and emergency physicians.
Conclusion: The diagnostic value of standard radiographs was weak whatever the physician. Therefore, helical CT of the entire cervical spine is absolutely necessary and must be performed during the initial evaluation, if the haemodynamic conditions are required.