Do natural health food stores require regulation?

N Z Med J. 2002 Sep 13;115(1161):U165.

Abstract

Aim: To compare advice provided by health food stores (HFS) and pharmacies in relation to medical conditions and assess the need for regulation of HFS.

Methods: We assessed the advice provided by 26 health food stores (HFS) and 26 pharmacies to an individual presenting with symptoms suggestive of moderate to severe asthma who had not seen a general practitioner.

Results: The advice provided by the two stores differed markedly. 22/26 pharmacy staff diagnosed asthma/probable asthma, whereas only 15/26 HFS staff reached the same conclusion. 92.3% of pharmacy staff compared to 34.6% of HFS staff referred the investigator to a doctor; 5 HFS advised the investigator against seeing a doctor. A wide variety of remedies were recommended by the HFS, none of which are known to be beneficial in the treatment of asthma.

Conclusion: HFS promoting herbal products for medical conditions should be regulated in a similar fashion to shops that dispense pharmaceutical products.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Consumer Advocacy / standards
  • Consumer Advocacy / statistics & numerical data
  • Consumer Product Safety / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Female
  • Food, Organic / standards*
  • Herbal Medicine / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Herbal Medicine / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • New Zealand
  • Pharmacies / standards
  • Pharmacies / statistics & numerical data
  • Referral and Consultation / statistics & numerical data
  • Respiratory Sounds / etiology
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases / complications
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases / diagnosis
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases / therapy