An alternative model has been proposed for the development of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in families where chromosome 3 translocations segregate with the disease. In this model, the existence of a translocation involving chromosome 3 would favour the non-disjunctional loss of the derivative chromosome carrying the 3p segment. Additionally, subsequent somatic mutations in the VLH gene, located in 3p25-26, would inactivate this tumour suppressor gene. In the present work, we describe a new family with two clear-cell RCC affected members and a t(3;8)(p13;q24.1) translocation in two consecutive generations. We observed loss of the derivative chromosome carrying the 3p segment (der(8)) and somatic mutation of the VHL gene in the left-kidney tumoral tissue of the proband. His right-kidney tumour carried a different VHL mutation and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was not detected. The mother of the proband was also clear-cell RCC-affected but the tumoral tissue analysed did not carry any VHL gene mutations. Another member of the family, a maternal aunt, had a papillary RCC and did not carry this translocation, the LOH on 3p or the VHL somatic mutations. Haplotype analysis of the three affected members revealed that they did not inherit a common region on 3p, confirming the different genetic origin of both tumour types. Finally, the presence of RCC in other non-available members of the family highlights the overall risk for RCC in families with chromosome 3 translocations. In the present work, we have confirmed the proposed mechanism for the development of clear-cell RCC in this family, although we cannot discard the existence of other genes, in addition to VHL, being involved in hereditary RCC.