Is it time to introduce repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation into standard clinical practice for the treatment of depressive disorders?

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;37(1):5-11; discussion 12-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01115.x.

Abstract

Objective: To examine issues relating to the potential introduction of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) into clinical practice as a treatment for depression.

Method: A review of the outcomes literature accompanied by an analysis of issues relating to the potential advantages and pitfalls of the introduction of rTMS as a treatment strategy.

Results: Evidence is progressively accumulating that rTMS has antidepressant properties that are clinically relevant. These effects are biologically plausible and supported by basic research. Patients with therapy-resistant depression have few treatment alternatives and experience significant suffering, thus justifying the early introduction of a new treatment such as rTMS for this patient group. However, this must be balanced by a need to foster considerable further research and not to raise expectations unreasonably.

Conclusions: It is timely for rTMS to be made more available to patients with treatment-resistant mood disorders. This need not be limited to clinical research trials but should only occur in medical settings where continual evaluation and research is conducted.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Depressive Disorder / diagnosis
  • Depressive Disorder / physiopathology
  • Depressive Disorder / therapy*
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy / instrumentation*
  • Functional Laterality / physiology
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Prefrontal Cortex / physiopathology
  • Skull
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / adverse effects*
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / instrumentation*