Objective: To evaluate advantages and drawbacks of a controlled conservative management of patients with severe gastric caustic injuries.
Methods: Among 40 patients with severe caustic gastric burns (> IIb), 28 with stade III lesions (mosaic necrosis: n = 10, extensive or circumferential necrosis: n = 18) were managed prospectively from 1990 to 1998. Twenty-two patients had associated stage III oesophageal lesions and 6 had stage III duodenal lesions. All patients were followed up by daily surgical examination. Total gastrectomy with esophageal exclusion or stripping was performed in case of perforation.
Results: Five immediate and 7 secondary total gastrectomies, two associated esophagectomies and two jejunal resections were performed. Mortality rate was 18% (5/28). Sixteen gastric preservations (60%) were achieved, including 7 complete and 9 partial because of gastric stricture. Eighteen esophagoplasties for oesophageal strictures or after gastrectomy were performed without mortality.
Conclusion: Stage III caustic injuries of the stomach, when they are not immediately life-threatening, do not systematically require total gastrectomy. A strict conservative attitude can be done with significant morbidity and acceptable mortality and significantly raises the numbers of preserved stomach.