The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Feb;128(2):257-62. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.79.

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims were to determine the incidence of exaggerated hearing thresholds in individuals complaining of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as a result of impulse noise using cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) and to identify any associated audiometric features.

Setting: We conducted an office-based study.

Study design: In this prospective case series, 1154 males complaining of NIHL were assessed with pure tone audiometry; 673 had CERA. Pure tone averages (PTA) and hearing disability were calculated using the Irish and American Medical Association systems. A PTA of >10 dB worse than the CERA average was considered evidence of exaggerated thresholds.

Results: The mean PTA was 33 dB. Seventy-two percent had a hearing disability of an average of 26% when assessed by the Irish system. Fifty-four percent had a hearing disability of an average of 30% when assessed by the American Medical Association system. Twenty-six percent of subjects had exaggerated thresholds based on CERA. A binaural hearing threshold of >25 dB at 500 Hz had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 59% for the detection of exaggerated thresholds.

Conclusion: Exaggerated hearing thresholds are common. A hearing threshold of >25 dB at 500 Hz should be considered an indication for CERA testing.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Audiometry, Pure-Tone / methods*
  • Auditory Threshold / physiology
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory / physiology*
  • Female
  • Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced / diagnosis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index