Purpose: Experience with simple perineal prostatectomy has not been well described in the recent literature. We describe our operative technique and compare objective demographic, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters in patients undergoing open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia via 3 routes, namely perineal, retropubic, and suprapubic.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of open prostatectomy at Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego between August 2001 and September 2002. A total of 22 patients were identified. Objective parameters were recorded and compared, including patient age, history of urinary retention, ultrasound volume, prostate specific antigen, patient and specimen weight, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, days of hospitalization and postoperative analgesic requirement.
Results: In the 22 patients who underwent open prostatectomy the operative approach was perineal in 6, retropubic in 8 and suprapubic in 8. Operative time and hospital stay were significantly less in the perineal prostatectomy group.
Conclusions: Simple perineal prostatectomy is a viable alternative for most patients considered candidates for open prostatectomy and it is our preferred approach for obese patients. With perineal prostatectomy patients may expect shorter hospitalization and less analgesic requirement but likely require a longer period of catheter drainage.