Primary and revision lumbar discectomy. A 16-year review from one centre

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Aug;85(6):871-4.

Abstract

We present a review of 553 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica ascribed to prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. One surgeon in one institution undertook or supervised all the operations over a period of 16 years. The total number of primary discectomies included in the study was 531, of which 42 subsequently required a second operation for recurrent sciatica, giving a revision rate of 7.9%. Factors associated with reoperation were analysed. A contained disc protrusion was almost three times more likely to need revision surgery, compared with extruded or sequestrated discs. Patients with primary protrusions had a significantly greater straight-leg raise and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings compared with those with extruded or sequestrated discs. These patients should therefore be selected out clinically and treated by a more enthusiastic conservative programme, since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Diskectomy / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / complications
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / surgery*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nervous System Diseases / etiology
  • Odds Ratio
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Recurrence
  • Reoperation
  • Risk Factors
  • Sciatica / etiology
  • Sciatica / surgery*
  • Sex Factors
  • Time Factors