[Prospective study of echography versus phlebography in the detection of sural venous thrombosis]

J Radiol. 1992 Nov;73(11):579-84.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Among all noninvasive techniques, high-resolution ultrasonography used alone has rarely been used for the diagnosis of thrombosis in the calf. Nineteen patients with suspected AVT were examined with ultrasonography and phlebography during 4 months. For each patient, a sonogram and a phlebogram were taken within less than 24 hours and interpreted independently. The sonographic exploration with a high-resolution (5 MHz) transducer covers all deep trunks and muscular veins (soleus or gastrocnemius muscles). The positivity criterion is the persistence of a hypoechogenic endoluminal image under moderate compression. According to the phlebographic data, 65% of the patients present with thrombosis. Ultrasonography has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 99% for the study of the deep trunks. Ultrasonography screens more thromboses than phlebography (23 cases versus 17). On a whole, ultrasonography seems to be more sensitive than phlebography for the diagnosis of recent sural thrombosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Emergencies
  • Female
  • Femoral Vein*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscles / blood supply
  • Phlebography*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Thrombosis / diagnosis
  • Thrombosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Ultrasonography