A great deal of information on short-term mutagenicity assays presently exists, having been generated through individual as well as large comparative programs. The comparative programs have often examined the same tests, but with different sets of chemicals; this then gives rise to the problem of how to identify the information which is common to the different data bases, i.e., the general properties of the assays. This paper continues previous analyses of this subject, and describes a general approach by which different and heterogeneous data bases can be compared to each other. The results relative to 4 assays (Salmonella typhimurium gene mutation, mouse lymphoma L5178Y cell gene mutation, chromosomal aberrations in CHO cells, and SCEs in CHO cells) in 4 different data bases were studied. Factor analysis was used to model the different pieces of information. The analysis demonstrated a concordance between the indications of the U.S. National Toxicology Program and the International Program for the Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens, whereas the results of Gene-Tox and the International Program for Chemical Safety turned out to be biased, to different degrees, by their specific aims and characteristics. Moreover, the general properties--independent of the specific data bases--of the 4 assays were highlighted, and the similarities between the performances of the assays were given a quantitative measure.