[A comparison between echography and computed tomography in assessing neoplastic recurrences in superficial soft tissues]

Radiol Med. 1992 Sep;84(3):204-7.
[Article in Italian]

Abstract

Thirty-seven superficial soft-tissue recurrences were evaluated with ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) to assess the correct diagnostic approach. US and CT examinations were performed at the same time. High-frequency US probes and a third-generation CT scanner were employed; all the lesions underwent also histology or cytology. US correctly identified as recurrences or fibrous tissue all the 37 lesions, whereas CT diagnosed 30 lesions only. Seven of the 14 recurrences < 2 cm diameter were not demonstrated. In conclusion, US provides more reliable information than CT relative to small lesions, which suggests that US must be performed just after therapy. Nevertheless, when bone involvement is suspected, CT is required and its use is also suggested to monitor distant metastases.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Cytodiagnosis
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnosis*
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / pathology
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Ultrasonography*