The appropriate role for additional radiotherapy in patients with resectable rectal cancer is not yet settled. Irradiation has been considered by surgeons and radiotherapists as superfluous since no effect on survival has been shown. However, numerous trials have demonstrated that peri-operative radiotherapy decreases an often high local recurrence rate while others believe it has a definite place in routine management. Several surgeons have, on the contrary, claimed that a skilled surgeon compared to a less skilled surgeon, will get the same acceptably low local recurrence rates. Since we will probably never have a randomized trial comparing "good" and "bad" surgeons, this argument cannot be settled. A further obstacle arises in the difficulty of persuading surgeons to organize their routine work so that it is performed in an optimal way by those specializing in this field. The question also arises whether radiotherapy should be delivered pre-operatively, postoperatively or as a "sandwich" technique, i.e., both pre-operatively and postoperatively. According to radio-biological considerations and results from reported trials, the best effect on local tumor control has been achieved using pre-operative radiotherapy.