Junior versus senior physicians for informing families of intensive care unit patients

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb 15;169(4):512-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200305-645OC. Epub 2003 Dec 4.

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of information delivered to family members of critically ill patients by junior and senior physicians, we performed a prospective randomized multicenter trial in 11 French intensive care units. Patients (n = 220) were allocated at random to having their family members receive information by only junior or only senior physicians throughout the intensive care unit stay; there were 92 and 93 evaluable cases in the junior and senior groups, respectively, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Between Days 3 and 5, one family representative per patient was evaluated for comprehension of the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in the patient; satisfaction with information and care; and presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of these three criteria. Family members informed by a junior physician were more likely to feel they had not been given enough information time (additional time wanted: 3 [0-6.5] vs. 0 [0-5] minutes, p = 0.01) and to have sought additional explanations from their usual doctor (48.9 vs. 34.4%, p = 0.004). Specialty residents, if given opportunities for acquiring experience, can become proficient in communicating with families and share this task with senior physicians.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Communication*
  • Comprehension
  • Critical Care*
  • Critical Illness*
  • Family Health
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Internship and Residency
  • Male
  • Medical Staff, Hospital*
  • Middle Aged
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Professional-Family Relations*
  • Prospective Studies