Effectiveness and safety of epilepsy surgery: what is the evidence?

CNS Spectr. 2004 Feb;9(2):120-2, 126-32. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900008488.

Abstract

Evidence from a recent randomized controlled trial of surgical versus medical therapy of temporal lobe epilepsy proves that antero-mesial resection is safe and more effective than medical therapy. The number of patients needed to treat for one patient to become free of disabling seizures is two, which is superior to most interventions in neurology. A meta-analysis of non-randomized trials gives almost identical results; about two-thirds of patients become seizure-free, compared with only 8% with medical therapy. The results are remarkably similar among studies from different parts of the world. Quality of life improves early after epilepsy surgery, the improvements are both statistically and clinically significant, and they are sustained. Surgical morbidity with clinically important permanent sequelae is 2%. Epilepsy surgery remains underutilized in developed countries and it does not exist in all but a few developing countries. Current randomized trials are underway to explore the effect of early surgery versus optimum medical therapy on the prevention of disability in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, and to examine the effectiveness of novel interventions, such as minimally invasive surgery and brain stimulation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anterior Temporal Lobectomy*
  • Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe / diagnosis
  • Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe / surgery*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic