No need for routine closed suction drainage in elective arthroplasty of the hip: a prospective randomized trial in 104 operations

Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Feb;75(1):30-3. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001708050.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of closed suction drainage (CSD) in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Patients and methods: We randomized 104 elective, consecutive THAs to receive drainage (53) or no drainage (51). 60 arthroplasties were cemented and 44 hybrid.

Results: In the drainage group, 2 hematomas and 2 superficial wound infections occurred; there were no wound complications in the undrained group (p = 0.04). Patients receiving drainage had a greater reduction in hematocrit (10.4 vs 7.4) (p = 0.03), and longer hospital stay (5.1 days vs 4.7) (p = 0.01). At the 3-month follow-up, we found no deep wound infections in either group.

Interpretation: We no longer use CSD in elective, primary, routine THA.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Joint / surgery
  • Humans
  • Joint Diseases / surgery
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Postoperative Complications*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Suction / statistics & numerical data*