Reliability of the IOLMaster in measuring corneal power changes after photorefractive keratectomy

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2):409-13. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00583-2.

Abstract

Purpose: To test the accuracy of the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss) in detecting corneal power changes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, 2nd University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Methods: Two hundred twenty-five consecutive eyes that had PRK (mean -5.13 diopters [D] +/- 2.98 [SD] [range +0.25 to -16.25 D]) were analyzed. The data included preoperative and postoperative (1, 3, and 6 months) subjective refraction and computerized keratometry. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the correlation between the changes in the subjective refraction at the corneal plane and the changes in keratometry.

Results: The mean difference between the changes in refraction and the measured corneal changes was 0.75 +/- 1.13 D (range -3.84 to +7.68 D) at 1 month, 0.92 +/- 1.10 D (range -0.87 to +7.93 D) at 3 months, and 0.75 +/- 0.98 D (range -1.70 to +3.85 D) at 6 months. The difference was significant (P<.001).

Conclusion: Automated keratometry provided by the IOLMaster did not accurately reflect the effective refractive changes after PRK, particularly in eyes that had a high dioptric treatment.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Astigmatism / physiopathology*
  • Astigmatism / surgery
  • Cornea / physiopathology*
  • Cornea / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interferometry / instrumentation
  • Interferometry / methods
  • Lasers, Excimer
  • Light
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myopia / physiopathology*
  • Myopia / surgery
  • Photorefractive Keratectomy*
  • Refraction, Ocular / physiology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Visual Acuity / physiology