Objective: To evaluate clinical symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and biochemical parameters in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency under treatment with two different hydrocortisone regimens (20 mg-0 mg-10 mg/day and 10 mg-5 mg-5 mg/day), each maintained for 3 months and compare results obtained with those in healthy controls.
Design, patients and methods: Twelve patients with primary adrenal insufficiency were studied. Clinical symptoms and HRQL with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) were evaluated and Na, K and serum cortisol determined at 09:00 h, 12:30 h and 17:30 h and urinary free cortisol (UFC) throughout the day. Control group comprised 19 healthy subjects.
Results: No differences in specific adrenal insufficiency symptoms were detected between the two regimens. HRQL was worse in energy dimension assessed by the NHP compared to the general population, regardless of 20 mg-0 mg-10 mg/day or 10 mg-5 mg-5 mg/day treatment (p=0.03 and p=0.013). The total NHP score was only adversely affected when patients were on the 10 mg-5 mg-5 mg/day hydrocortisone replacement regimen (p=0.008). Serum cortisol concentrations were higher than controls at 09:00 h, and lower at 17:30 h with both regimens, whereas serum cortisol at 12:30 h and UFC were within the 5th-95th percentile normal range only with the 10 mg-5 mg-5 mg/day regimen.
Conclusions: Patients with primary adrenal insufficiency had worse HRQL in the NHP energy dimension compared with the general population, regardless of the hydrocortisone regimen although total score for HRQL was worse only with the 10 mg-5 mg-5 mg/day regimen. Patients on the thrice-daily hydrocortisone regimen showed a more physiological cortisol profile, leading us to recommend initially treating patients with this dose and increasing it in the case of impaired HRQL.