Purpose: Comparison of MRI and macropathologic evaluation using various sequences and field strengths in the detection, localization and measurement of cartilage defects in an animal model.
Materials and methods: After open creation of retropatellar cartilage defects of various widths, depths and locations in 8 cadaveric sheep knee joints, the knees were examined using a fat-suppressed (FS), proton density-weighted (PD) fast spin echo (FSE), and 2D and 3D gradient echo (GE) sequences on 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR scanners. The images were analyzed by two independent radiologists in a blinded manner, by dividing the patella into 15 virtual segments. The results were correlated with the macropathologic findings with regards to location, width, and depth of the defects.
Results: The highest sensitivity (67.1 %), diagnostic accuracy (85.4 %), positive (87.3 %), and negative (84.7 %) predictive values in detecting defects were obtained using the 3.0 T FS-3D-GE sequence. The highest specificity (95.6 %) yielded the 3.0 T FS-2D-GE sequence, with the other sequences inferior by no more than 2.6 %. In general, FS-3D-GE sequences were superior to FS-2D-GE (3.0 T: p < 0.05; 1.5 T: p < 0.05) and especially to FS-PD-FSE sequences (3.0 T: p < 0.01; 1.5 T: p < 0.05). In determining the defects' widths, the 3.0 T FS-3D-GE sequence was superior to all other sequences (correct measurements: 50.0 %), with only slight superiority to the 1.5 T FS-3D-GE sequence (46.9 %, p > 0.05) but clear superiority to the other sequences (28.1 - 40.6 %, vs. 1.5 T FS-PD-FSE: p < 0.05, vs. other sequences: p > 0.05). To determine the defects' depths, the 1.5 T FS-3D-GE sequence was most reliable (correct measurements: 53.1 %), followed by the 3.0 T FS-3D-GE sequence (50.0 %, significance of difference: p > 0.05).
Conclusion: In detecting cartilage defects, the field strength of 3.0 Tesla was only superior to 1.5 T MRI using fat-saturated 3D- or 2D-GE-sequences but not in fat-saturated proton density-weighted SE-sequences. In determination of depth and length of the defects, the higher field strength was not advantageous.