Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):2377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.027.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the contrast thresholds (CTs) in normal subjects using a high-luminance, letter-recognition task under clinically relevant testing conditions.

Setting: Texas Tech University Health Sciences System, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Methods: Sixty normal subjects aged 20 to 49 years with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes participated. M & S Technologies software was used to display black-on-white Sloan letters at contrast levels of 25%, 20%, 15%, 12%, and 10% through 1% in 1% decrements. The effects of age, sex, optotype size, eye dominance, ambient illumination level (bright = 625 - 630 lux; dim = <3 lux), and direction of approach to threshold were analyzed using a multivariate, ordinary, least-squares analysis.

Results: Age and sex did not influence CTs. Ascending versus descending testing was not statistically significant (P>.5). The effects of room illumination and eye dominance were significant (P<.01). Significant differences were found between 20/30 and 20/50, 20/30 and 20/70, and 20/50 and 20/70 optotype sizes (P<.01 for all comparisons).

Conclusions: A commercially available, computer-based test of CTs was easy to administer and apparently easy for inexperienced subjects to perform. The results suggest criteria for detecting visual problems concerned with familiar but complex spatial-image shapes. This information might be used to assess the effects of treatments such as laser refractive surgery on recognition contrast. Further study is warranted.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Contrast Sensitivity / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reference Values
  • Sensory Thresholds / physiology
  • Vision Tests / instrumentation
  • Vision Tests / methods
  • Visual Acuity