The impact of triple drug immunosuppression on clinical results of cadaveric kidney transplantation: a comparison of conventional immunosuppression

Acta Med Okayama. 1992 Feb;46(1):53-6. doi: 10.18926/AMO/32683.

Abstract

A retrospective study was carried out in 110 cadaveric kidney transplant recipients to compare the effects of low doses of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (AZP) and steroids (triple-drug therapy) with those of higher doses of steroids plus AZP (conventional immunosuppression). Graft survival rate in the triple-drug therapy was 77%, 69%, and 69% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. This was significantly better than 48%, 34%, and 29% in conventional immunosuppression. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower in the triple-drug therapy than in conventional immunosuppression (25% vs 58%). In conclusion, our study shows that triple-drug therapy using low-dose cyclosporine is the safest of the immunosuppressive regimens and provides a beneficial effect on the long-term survival of cadaveric kidney transplants.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Azathioprine / administration & dosage*
  • Cadaver
  • Cyclosporine / administration & dosage*
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppression Therapy / methods
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Male
  • Methylprednisolone / administration & dosage*
  • Middle Aged

Substances

  • Cyclosporine
  • Azathioprine
  • Methylprednisolone