Is removal of internal limiting membrane always necessary during stage 3 idiopathic macular hole surgery?

Retina. 2005 Jan;25(1):54-8. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200501000-00007.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the indications for internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal in stage 3 idiopathic macular holes (MHs).

Methods: Focal posterior vitreous detachments (PVDs) at MH rims were examined preoperatively by optical coherence tomography and binocular slit-lamp fundus examination in 19 patients retrospectively. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy and creation of a PVD, and some eyes underwent a second surgery to remove the ILM. Indications of ILM removal for MH closure were discussed.

Results: Preoperatively, 9 eyes did not (non-PVD group) and 10 eyes did (PVD group) have complete focal PVDs. In all nine eyes in the non-PVD group, MHs were closed after the creation of a PVD without ILM peeling (P <0.05, chi test). In the PVD group, 5 eyes (50%) had MHs closed by making PVD complete without ILM removal, and 5 eyes (50%) required ILM removal in a second surgery. In the end, closure of MHs was achieved in all eyes.

Conclusion: Anatomic closure of stage 3 idiopathic MHs without a PVD at the rim of the hole may be achieved only by creating a PVD without ILM removal.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Basement Membrane / surgery
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
  • Epiretinal Membrane / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retinal Perforations / classification
  • Retinal Perforations / diagnosis
  • Retinal Perforations / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Visual Acuity
  • Vitrectomy
  • Vitreous Body / surgery