A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post-operative symptoms

Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00953.x.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative symptoms following coblation tonsillectomy with those experienced following a traditional cold dissection.

Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Secondary otorhinolaryngology care.

Participants: Ninety-two adult patients with recurrent tonsillitis meriting tonsillectomy were recruited and randomly allocated into either coblation or cold dissection tonsillectomy groups.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were post-operative pain, otalgia, swallowing and analgesia use at 6-8 hours, 1, 3, 7 and 14 days post-operative. Secondary outcomes were post-operative day returned to eating and returned to normal activities/work.

Results: No significant differences between the two groups (P >or= 0.1) were found in any of the above primary outcomes, apart from swallowing at 6-8 hrs post-operatively where the cold dissection group had less pain. This group also returned earlier to normal eating (P = 0.03). The power of the study was sufficient to show a difference in the visual analogue scores of 2 between groups.

Conclusions: The use of coblation to perform tonsillectomy does not confer any symptomatic benefits to the patient over conventional cold dissection tonsillectomy.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Catheter Ablation / instrumentation*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Tonsillectomy / instrumentation*
  • Tonsillitis / surgery