Rationale and objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the degree of stair-step artifact on coronal reformation computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography images obtained using single-detector helical CT (SDCT), four-detector (4-MDCT), and eight-detector multidetector-row CT (8-MDCT) and compare the degree of motion artifact on the corresponding axial CT images.
Materials and methods: Three groups of consecutive patients imaged by means of CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus were retrospectively identified by using CT records at our institution: (1) group A (n = 38), SDCT; (2) group B (n = 36), 4-MDCT; and (3) group C (n = 74), 8-MDCT. For each case, coronal multiplanar volume reformation maximal intensity projection images were created by using a standard technique. All images were reviewed in a randomized fashion by two thoracic radiologists who were blinded to the type of CT scanner. Stair-step artifact of pulmonary arteries on coronal reformation images was graded by consensus agreement using a four-point scale (0 = no artifact to 3 = severe artifact). Axial images were assessed for six parameters of motion artifact. The sum of these grades resulted in a total motion score, with a potential range of 0 (no motion) to 12 (severe motion). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test.
Results: Stair-step artifacts were significantly higher for SDCT (mean, 2.9; median, 3) compared with 4-MDCT (mean, 2.2; median, 2; P < .0001) and 8-MDCT (mean, 1.5; median, 1; P < .0001). Total motion scores were significantly higher for SDCT (mean, 9.3) compared with 4-MDCT (mean, 8.4; P = .03) and 8-MDCT (mean, 6.8; P < .0001).
Conclusion: Stair-step artifacts are significantly higher with SDCT compared with MDCT. For MDCT, eight-detector scanners produce images with significantly less artifact than four-detector scanners.