Objective: We analyzed the adequacy of antibiotic therapy prescribed for urinary tract infections (UTI): prostatitis, pyelonephritis, indwelling catheter-associated UTIs, or other undefined UTIs.
Design: The adequacy of prescriptions to local guidelines was assessed retrospectively in two wards (Internal Medicine and Surgical Urology) of the Nantes University Hospital. The principal criteria involved simultaneously: choice of the molecule, dose, and treatment duration. Non-observances of guidelines were major (non-adequacy of the molecule, prescription of a non-active molecule according to in vitro susceptibility tests, non-appropriate treatment abstention), or minor (non-justified treatment, non-justified bitherapy, no prescription of bitherapy when requested, no treatment adaptation when requested, too short or too long treatment length, dosage mistakes).
Results: One thousand eighty-six infections were collected over a 24-month period. The overall rate of adequate prescriptions was 40.1% (46.6% in Internal Medicine and 36.5% in Surgical Urology). In Internal Medicine (226 non observance among 389 prescriptions), the ratio of major non-observance of guidelines was 9.8%. Among them, 44.7% were non-appropriate treatment abstentions. In Surgical Urology (539 non observance out of 695 prescriptions), non-observance related to treatment length were the most frequent. The ratio of major non-observance was 19.9%. Among them, non-adequacy of the molecule reached 60.7%. Non-justified treatment and non-appropriate bitherapies were frequent.
Conclusions: For both units, indwelling catheter-related UTIs and other UTIs accounted for more than 50% of the infections although not detailed in the local guidelines. Identifying and analyzing Non observance may lead to targeted correcting actions to improve prescription quality.