Patients, mean age 70 years, with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators treated with dual-chamber rate responsive pacing (DDDR-70) have a higher mortality than patients with backup ventricular pacing (VVI-40) at 3.7-year follow-up

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 May;60(5):603-4. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.5.603.

Abstract

Background: One study showed in 506 patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AICDs) that the mortality at 1-year follow-up was 6.5% with ventricular backup pacing at 40/minute (VVI-40) versus 10.1% in patients with dual-chamber rate responsive pacing at 70/minute (DDDR-70).

Methods: We performed a retrospective study to determine all-cause mortality in all patients at a university hospital who had AICDs without indications for antibradycardia pacing. Of 535 patients, mean age 70 +/- 12 years, 271 patients had backup ventricular pacing with a VVI-40, and 264 patients had dual-chamber rate responsive pacing with a DDDR-70.

Results: At 3.7-year mean follow-up, all-cause mortality was 19% (50 of 264 patients) in patients with DDDR-70 pacing versus 11% (29 of 271 patients) with VVI-40 pacing (p < .01).

Conclusion: Because of the increased mortality, increased cost, and complexity for dual-chamber rate responsive pacing in patients with AICDs, concomitant DDDR pacing at a rate of 70/minute in patients without an indication for antibradycardia pacing is not warranted.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Geriatric Assessment*
  • Hospitals, University
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / diagnosis
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / mortality*
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy*