Left ventricular ejection fraction and prevalence of new left ventricular wall motion abnormality at long-term follow-up in patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators treated with dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing at a rate of 70/minute versus backup ventricular pacing at a rate of 40/minute

Am J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 1;96(3):412-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.088.

Abstract

Baseline and long-term follow-up 2-dimensional echocardiograms were obtained in 160 patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without indications for antibradycardia pacing, who had backup ventricular pacing at a rate of 40/minute (VVI-40) or dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing at a rate of 70/minute (DDDR-70). At 37 months of follow-up for 80 patients treated with VVI-40 and 23 months of follow-up for 80 patients treated with DDDR-70, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 36 +/- 8% at baseline and 36 +/- 8% at follow-up and 36 +/- 7% at baseline and 30 +/- 7% at follow-up (p <0.01), respectively. At follow-up, the left ventricular ejection fraction was decreased >7% in 25 of 80 patients (31%)treated with DDDR-70 and in 9 of 80 patients (11%) treated with VVI-40 (p <0.01). A new left ventricular wall motion abnormality developed in 23 of 80 patients (29%) treated with DDDR-70 and in 11 of 80 patients (14%) treated with VVI-40 (p <0.025).

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / methods*
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prevalence
  • Stroke Volume / physiology*
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / diagnostic imaging
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / epidemiology
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / physiopathology*