Objective: To study the prevalence and diagnostic significance of antibodies against nucleosomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as compared to five anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) assays.
Methods: The study included 305 patients with SLE, 125 patients with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and 415 healthy controls. Anti-nucleosome antibodies were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ANA by immunofluorescence (IF) using Hep-2 cells. Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies were measured by three commercial ELISAs and by IF using Crithidia luciliae as antigen.
Results: Compared to three ELISAs for anti-dsDNA, the anti-nucleosome assay was less sensitive (30% vs. 29-69%) but equally specific (90% vs. 77-95%) for SLE. The most sensitive test was ANA (76%), and the least sensitive was Crithidia (13%). The correlations between the different assays were good (p < 0.001 for all comparisons).
Conclusion: The anti-nucleosome antibody assay does not offer additional information compared to conventionally used anti-dsDNA tests in the differential diagnosis of SLE.