Questioning the assumptions in the debate on assisted reproduction: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):152-4. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60950-9.

Abstract

The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has issued a series of non-dogmatic recommendations. Also regarding elective sex selection, it has adopted a controversial position. Sex selection should be allowed for family balancing. However, the acceptability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a method for selecting the embryos can be questioned on the basis of social harm. In countries with a shortage of medical personnel and a limited health care budget, elective procedures are a loss to society. This loss should be compensated by imposing a 'social compensation tax' for every application of elective sexing.

Publication types

  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Advisory Committees
  • Female
  • Government Regulation*
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Preimplantation Diagnosis / ethics
  • Preimplantation Diagnosis / trends
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / ethics*
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Sex Preselection / ethics
  • United Kingdom