[Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A in comparison with unenhanced MRI and multidetector spiral-CT]

Rofo. 2005 Nov;177(11):1571-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858627.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A to provide additional information for characterization of focal liver tumors compared with non-enhanced MRI and multislice spiral CT.

Materials and methods: In a prospective manner the images of 45 patients who underwent multislice spiral CT, unenhanced MRI alone and unenhanced and SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI including dynamic imaging at a field strength of 1.0 T were analyzed in a blinded reading. The readers had to determine on a scale from 1 to 5 whether a tumor was benign or malignant. Furthermore, the readers had to give a definitive diagnosis for each lesion. A true cut needle biopsy served as gold standard against which all imaging procedures were compared.

Results: The sensitivity for differentiation malignant vs. benign lesion was 77 % with spiral CT, 72 % with unenhanced MRI and 94 % with SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI, respectively (p < 0.05). The specificity for spiral CT was 73 %, for unenhanced MRI 83 % and for contrast-enhanced MRI 83 %, respectively (n. s.). Compared with the histopathologic results, the correct diagnosis was made with spiral CT in 25/45 (56 %), unenhanced MRI in 16/45 (36 %) and contrast-enhanced MRI in 32/45 (71 %) of the patients (p < 0.05). For the subgroup of patients with liver cirrhosis, the correct diagnosis was established with spiral CT in 16/23 (70 %), unenhanced MRI in 9/23 (39 %) and contrast-enhanced MRI in 19/23 (83 %) of the patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A has the ability to improve the differential diagnosis of focal liver tumors compared with unenhanced MRI and multislice spiral CT.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / diagnosis*
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / diagnostic imaging
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / pathology
  • Contrast Media*
  • Dextrans
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Ferrosoferric Oxide
  • Humans
  • Iron*
  • Liver / pathology
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / standards
  • Magnetite Nanoparticles
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Oxides*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, Spiral Computed / methods*
  • Tomography, Spiral Computed / standards

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Dextrans
  • Magnetite Nanoparticles
  • Oxides
  • Iron
  • ferumoxides
  • Ferrosoferric Oxide