[Evaluation on the safety and immunogenicity of Canada split influenza virus vaccine]

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Jul;26(7):503-6.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Canada split influenza virus vaccine.

Methods: Cluster samples were by randomly chosen and divided into split vaccination group and homoimported influenza vaccination group.

Results: After injection, fever-reaction and local reaction rates of 'trial' group were found as 3.69% and 1.75% respectively, but no statistical significance was found when compared with 'control' group. However the antibody positive rates of 'trail' and 'control' groupsappeared statistically significant (H1N1: 96.8% vs. 92.3%, H3N2: 95.8% vs. 90.2%, B: 52.3% vs. 62.3%). For geometric mean titer (GMT) of type H1N1, H3H2 and B antibody, 'trial' group and 'control' group increased 22.4, 16.8, 8.2 and 21.2, 12.5 and 7.4 times respectively. The antibody protective rates of type H1N1, H3N2 and B were 99%, 99% and 53.9% for 'trial' group, and 96.2%, 98.4% and 62.3% for 'control' but with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: Influenza split vaccine made in Shire company in Canada was safe and with good immunogenicity.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Antibody Formation / immunology
  • Canada
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions / immunology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Injections
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Orthomyxoviridae / immunology*
  • Time Factors
  • Viral Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Viral Vaccines / adverse effects*
  • Viral Vaccines / immunology*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Viral Vaccines