Implementing duty-hour restrictions without diminishing patient care or education: can it be done?

Acad Med. 2006 Jan;81(1):68-75. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200601000-00018.

Abstract

Purpose: To implement and evaluate a new ward team call system that would meet the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) duty-hour requirements without compromising patient care or detracting from resident education.

Method: The new system was implemented in the internal medicine residency program at the University Hospital at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. In 2003-04, residents and faculty were surveyed about their experiences with the new and old ward systems relative to duty-hour requirements, patient care, and resident education. Responses were given on a five-point scale (5 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree). Data were compiled and compared using a two-sample t-test.

Results: Faculty believed the new system improved compliance with the duty-hour requirements (mean = 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1-4.6), although were neutral regarding patient care (mean = 3.5, 95% CI: 3.2-3.8) and education (mean = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.9-3.6). Residents were more neutral regarding ACGME requirements (mean = 3.5, 95% CI: 3.3-3.7) and patient care (mean = 3.2, 95% CI 3.0-3.3). Residents reported a slightly negative impact on education (mean = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.5-3.0). In response to an exclusive question, residents reported that the new system did not reduce fatigue (mean = 2.7, 95% CI: 2.6-3.0).

Conclusions: Respondents perceived that this ward call system met ACGME requirements and maintained quality patient care but may have sacrificed some traditional resident education tenets.

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers / organization & administration
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Internal Medicine / education*
  • Internship and Residency / organization & administration*
  • Ohio
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Patient Care Team / organization & administration*
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Quality of Health Care*
  • Workload*