A biomechanical comparison of sacral pedicle screw salvage techniques

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):E166-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202747.90508.0d.

Abstract

Study design: Biomechanical cadaver study.

Objectives: The purpose of our study was to compare the pullout strength of standard, expandable, and cement-augmented pedicle screws.

Summary of background data: Salvage procedures are needed to restore the stability of lumbosacral arthrodesis when pedicle screw fixation in the sacrum fails.

Methods: Thirteen pairs of sacral (S1) pedicles were implanted initially with 7-mm tapped monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws (Moss Miami, Depuy Spine, Raynham, MA) inserted under fluoroscopy with bicortical purchase. The screws were distracted axially at a rate of 6 mm/min to measure pullout strength. One pedicle of each pair was assigned randomly to be revised with an expandable pedicle screw (omega-21 Spinal Fixation System, EBI Medical Systems, Parsippany, NJ); the contralateral pedicle was revised with a screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (Simplex P, Howmedica, Mahwah, NJ). The screws then were retested as before to measure pullout strength.

Results: Expandable screws (391 +/- 28 N) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screws (599 +/- 28 N) exhibited significantly greater pullout strength than their respective initial standard pedicle screws (145 +/- 28 N and 156 +/- 28 N).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that expandable pedicle screws may provide sufficient fixation, but these results need clinical verification.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / instrumentation
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / standards
  • Bone Screws / standards*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Materials Testing / instrumentation
  • Materials Testing / standards
  • Middle Aged
  • Sacrum / pathology
  • Sacrum / physiology*
  • Sacrum / surgery*