Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review

J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 May;4(5):351-8. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.5.351.

Abstract

Object: Despite extensive published research on thoracolumbar burst fractures, controversy still surrounds which is the most appropriate treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the scientific literature on operative and nonoperative treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures and no neurological deficit.

Methods: In their search of the literature, the authors identified all possible relevant studies concerning thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. Two independent observers performed study selection, methodological quality assessment, and data extraction in a blinded and objective manner for all papers identified during the search. In a synthesis of the literature, the authors obtained evidence for both operative and nonoperative treatments.

Conclusions: There is a lack of evidence demonstrating the superiority of one approach over the other as measured using generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life scales. There is no scientific evidence linking posttraumatic kyphosis to clinical outcomes. The authors found that there is a strong need for improved clinical research methodology to be applied to this patient population.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Back Pain / etiology
  • Bone Transplantation*
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / injuries*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Fractures / surgery*
  • Spinal Fusion*
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / injuries*
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / surgery