Vaccine risk/benefit communication: effect of an educational package for public health nurses

Health Educ Behav. 2006 Dec;33(6):787-801. doi: 10.1177/1090198106288996. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-service for public health nurses (PHNs) and accompanying educational materials could improve vaccine risk/benefit communication. The content and timing of vaccine communication were recorded during 246 pre-and 217 postintervention visits in two public health immunization clinics. Pre-/postintervention comparisons showed PHN communication of severe side effects (13% vs. 44%, p < .0001) and their management (29% vs. 60%, p < .0001) increased. There was no significant change in discussion of vaccine benefits (48% vs. 51%) or common side effects (91% vs. 92%),screening for contraindications (71% vs. 77%), or distribution of written information (89% vs. 92%). More parents initiated vaccine questions postintervention (27% vs. 39%,p < .01) and were more satisfied with vaccine-risk communication (8.1 vs. 8.9 on a 10-point scale, p < .01). Average vaccine communication time increased from 16 to 22 seconds (p < .01).

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Child, Preschool
  • Communication*
  • Contraindications
  • Female
  • Health Education*
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Health Promotion*
  • Humans
  • Immunization Programs
  • Infant
  • Kansas
  • Louisiana
  • Male
  • Mass Screening
  • Nurse's Role
  • Pamphlets*
  • Parents / education*
  • Professional-Family Relations
  • Public Health Nursing*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Vaccines / adverse effects*
  • Vaccines / immunology

Substances

  • Vaccines