The cellular transfer of clinical experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) with immune spleen cells is only accomplished following lymphoid cell stimulation during an intervening in vitro culture activation period. Recipients of these cells recover from the ensuing adoptively transferred paralytic episode and subsequently respond to active challenge with myelin basic protein (BP)-CFA in an accelerated time frame consistent with the presence of memory cells in the initial cell transfer inoculum. We have found that the addition of anti-CD4 antibody or dexamethasone during the activation period inhibits the development of the transfer active EAE effector cell subpopulation, but does not alter the in vitro development and subsequent expression of the BP-specific memory cell subpopulation. Additional experiments also suggest the development of memory cells in the absence of effector cell activity. PMA + ionomycin when used as a stimulus during the culture activation period leads to effector and memory cell development. The stimulation response is dose dependent, in that a reduced concentration of PMA + ionomycin does not lead to EAE effector cell development; however, at these reduced levels of PMA + ionomycin, memory cell development still occurred. Additional evidence which supports the concept of independent development of memory cells and effector cells was obtained with a BP-specific cell line. Following recovery from cell line-mediated clinical EAE, as well as following adoptive transfer of the cell lines in the precursor stage, cell recipients did not develop an early onset of active EAE when subsequently immunized with BP-CFA. Thus the BP-specific T-cell line appears to contain the precursors of the effector cell subpopulation but does not appear to contain the BP memory cell subpopulation. Collectively these observations suggest the existence of distinct T-cell subsets or pathways of development that are followed during the response to BP as measured by the development of clinical EAE.